Key Highlights |
Air Quality Trends Report | Air Quality Survey
Report |
Ozone Forecasting |
2005 Ozone Update |
Ozone Levels - Real
Time Data | Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan |
Air Quality
Technical Committee | 2004 Air Quality Addendum |
Analysis of Basic
Inspection/Maintenance Program | Air
Quality Brochures
PPACG is the lead air quality planning agency for the Pikes Peak Region. PPACG
reviews current and emerging air quality issues and goals, and develops plans to
improve air quality.
The Pikes Peak Region is in attainment for all EPA criteria air
quality pollutants -- carbon monoxide, ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen
dioxide, sulfur dioxide and lead.
Key Highlights
- The Pikes Peak Region is in attainment for all air quality
pollutants
- Last violation of ozone was in 1982
- Last violation of carbon monoxide was in 1989
- 2000-2001 represented the first season that Oxygenated Fuels were no longer required in the
Colorado Springs Urbanized Area
Air Quality Trends
Air Quality in the Pikes Peak Region: Monitoring and
Trends Report, October 2003 (.pdf)
This Report gives an overview of the spatial and temporal trends in the Pikes Peak Region for the six air quality pollutants the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to monitor: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone
(O3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), lead
(Pb) and particulate matter
(PM2.5 and PM10). The source and health effects of each pollutant are described and graphs both identify the pollutant levels from data available since 1988 and also compare them to the State and Federal ambient air quality standards. Mitigation strategies for each pollutant are also included. For
more information about the health effects of these pollutants, please visit the
EPA's website at www.epa.gov.
The Colorado Springs Urbanized Area is currently in attainment (meeting air quality standards) for all of the six air quality pollutants. The last violations in our region were in 1988 for carbon monoxide and in 1983 for ozone. Although our region is currently meeting air quality standards, this report will show that based upon current trends, certain air quality pollutants could exceed the standards in the future.
2004 Air Quality Data Addendum
The 2004 Air Quality Data Addendum provides an analysis of air quality trends
for Carbon Monoxide, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Lead and Particulate
Matter through 2003 and for ozone through 2004 based on air quality data
available for the Pikes Peak Region. This is the first addendum to the Air
Quality Trends Report that was completed in October 2003 and provided an
analyses of air quality trends through 2002. This addendum indicates no
change in temporal trends.

Air Quality Survey Report
Executive Summary | Response
& Accuracy | Purpose & Objectives | Results |
Demographics | Funding
| Future Activities
A PPACG Outdoor Air Quality Survey has been developed in response to
direction given by the PPACG Board of Directors
to
determine the importance of air quality issues and concerns of citizens within
the Pikes Peak Region. Click here for a PDF version of the
Outdoor Air Quality
Survey Report.
Executive Summary
The Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments
(PPACG) prepared the Outdoor Air Quality Survey Report based on the
results of an Outdoor Air Quality Survey that was conducted in June 2002. This
Report provides the results and analyses for each of the ten survey questions.
The survey was conducted to address the need expressed by the PPACG
Board of Directors to determine public perception of outdoor air quality in
the Colorado Springs Urbanized Area and to determine if
local standards for air quality should be developed that are higher than current
Federal standards.
Based on the results of the survey and a number of other factors, the
PPACG Board of Directors decided against developing stricter local air quality
standards at this time. For more information, please contact Rich Muzzy, PPACG
Environmental Planning Program Manager, at (719) 471-7080 x109 or send email to rmuzzy@ppacg.org.
Survey Response and Accuracy
A total of three thousand (3,000) surveys were sent out and four
hundred sixty-five (465) were returned and analyzed, which is a response rate of
about 15%. Based on this sample size, the error rate for responses to the survey
is +/- 5%.
Purpose and Objectives
The purpose of the survey was to determine public perception of air
quality and pollution in the Colorado Springs Urbanized Area and the need to
develop local standards for air quality that are stricter than current Federal
standards.
The objectives of the survey were to determine:
1. where air quality ranks among other "quality-of-life"
concerns;
2. what residents feel are the major sources of air pollution;
3. which programs are the most effective in reducing air quality
pollution;
and
4. how air pollution adversely affects residents in the Colorado
Springs
Urbanized Area.
Results
The key concerns that emerged from the survey results are
summarized below according to the original four objectives.
Objective #1: Determine where air quality ranks among other
"quality-of-life" concerns.
The majority of respondents (96%) feel that current air quality in our community
is either "good" (65%) or "fair" (31%). Sixty-eight percent
(68%) feel that air quality will be degraded in five years. As a
"quality-of-life" concern, respondents feel air quality is less
important than population growth, but that it is equally as important as crime,
traffic congestion, and water quality. Air quality is viewed by respondents as
more important than affordable housing and urban noise.
Objective #2: Determine what residents feel are the major sources of air pollution.
Respondents feel the major sources of air pollution are vehicles -- both
gasoline and diesel. Gasoline and diesel vehicles represented 69% of all
responses, which means they were chosen almost three-to-one over all other
possible responses (industry, off-road construction equipment, power plants,
street dust, wildfires, woodburning stoves/fireplaces and yard equipment).
Respondents feel that wildfires are a concern, but this could reflect the timing
of the survey, which was conducted during June 2002 when several major wildfires
were burning across Colorado.
Objective #3: Determine which programs are the most effective in reducing air quality
pollution.
Respondents feel that government regulations as opposed to voluntary programs
are responsible for the good air quality we currently have, but that more
voluntary programs rather than stronger government regulations should be
implemented to improve air quality in the future. Respondents might prefer a
free, voluntary program to a tax-supported government program to improve air
quality. Respondents were divided over the need to develop local standards that
are stricter than Federal standards.
Objective #4: Determine how air pollution adversely affects residents in the Colorado
Springs Urbanized Area.
Respondents appear to be more concerned over issues that are not related to health. The
most frequent response (26%) was "obscures mountain views", followed
by "long term health problems" (21%). Many of the suggestions to
improve air quality focused on improvements to the existing transportation
system.
Demographics
When demographic information provided by survey respondents was
compared to the 2000 U.S. Census data for the
City
of Colorado Springs, it was found that:
- males were over-represented and females were under-represented;
- respondents between ages 18 and 25 were under-represented;
- those between 26 to 55, 56 to 70 and 70+ were
over-represented;
- fewer survey respondents drive alone than Colorado Springs
residents as a whole; and
- fewer survey respondents
carpool than Colorado Springs residents as a whole.
Funding
The Outdoor Air Quality Survey Report and survey were developed
with financial assistance from the
Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment.
Future Activities
Evaluate ozone implementation strategies to determine possible methods
to reduce ozone levels in the future. PPACG will review strategies that have
been implemented in several cities along the Front Range and in other states to
reduce ozone levels.
Revise the Carbon Monoxide (CO) State Implementation Plan (SIP) using
the new Mobile 6 emissions model to determine if mandatory emissions control
strategies, such as the Inspection/Maintenance Program, are necessary to
maintain the Federal standard for CO. The current emissions budget will be
revised as part of this process. This will be a cooperative effort with the
Air
Pollution Control Division (APCD).

Ozone
Forecasting
The APCD will extend the
current ozone alert area to include the Colorado Springs Region. Ozone
forecasts will be done during the ozone season which is
from
June 1st through August 31st and all ozone forecasts will be issued by 4:00 p.m. the day before.
The ozone forecasts will be available on
APCD’s web page at the following link:
www.apcd.state.co.us/psi/o3_advisory.phtml
Although one alert will be done for the entire Front Range Urban Corridor,
language will specify if the Colorado Springs area is also expected to have
high or moderate levels.

Ozone Levels - Real Time Data
Real time ozone levels for both the USAF Academy and Manitou Springs are
now available at:
www.apcd.state.co.us/psi/main.html
After you go to this website click on the link entitled “Reports” which is
under the heading “Monitor Data” located on the left hand side of the
screen. In the “Reports” page go to “All Stations” and select ozone. Under
Reporting Stations “ACAD” stands for USAF Academy and “MAN” stands for
Manitou Springs. Real time data is available for the 1 hour and 8 hour
concentrations along with the corresponding Air Quality Index for that site.

Revised
Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan
The Revised Maintenance Plan
was approved by the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission in December 2003 and
the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments Board of Directors in September 2003.
A copy of the plan can be downloaded
here.
The
purpose of the Revised Maintenance Plan was to use the new Mobile 6 air
emissions model, which replaces the existing Mobile 5b model to remove the
Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program, if possible, and revise the
transportation emissions budget. Based on this analysis the two main revisions
proposed in the Draft Colorado Springs Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Attainment/Maintenance Plan are:
·
The
Inspection/Maintenance Program would be eliminated because it has been found no
longer necessary to maintain the CO Standard and therefore must be removed
according to CRS 25-7-105.1; and
·
The emissions
budget would be revised from 270 to 531 tons per day.
The
previous version of the Maintenance Plan was approved by the EPA in 2000 and,
contained two major revisions:
·
The oxygenated
fuels program in El Paso County was eliminated; and
·
The emissions
budget was revised from 212 to 270 tons per day.
The
oxygenated fuels program was eliminated in order to comply with C.R.S.
25-7-105.1. In 2000, the oxygenated fuels program was eliminated, but the I/M
Program remained in the Maintenance Plan because at that time (using Mobile 5b)
the program was necessary to maintain the Federal CO standard.
The 1999
Maintenance Plan also established a CO emissions budget of 270 tons per day,
which represents the Federally enforced, maximum allowable level or “cap” on
emissions from mobile sources that cannot be exceeded in the future. The CO
emissions that are projected for transportation plans and programs must conform
to the established emissions budget.
Basic Inspection/Maintenance Program
During 2004, PPACG and PPACG's Air quality Technical Committee (AQTC)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Basic Inspection/Maintenance Program in El
Paso County. The result of the research and analysis is compiled in a
report prepared by PPACG entitled Inspection/Maintenance Program Ozone Impact Summary Report.
On February 17, 2005 the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) held a
rulemaking hearing regarding proposed revisions to Regulation No. 11 -
Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) Testing Program. At this hearing the AQCC decided
to terminate the Basic I/M Program beginning January 1, 2007. The changes to
Regulation 11 and all AQCC Regulations can be found at -
www.cdphe.state.co.us/op/regs/airregs.asp
The
Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) and the Lead Air Quality Planning Agencies
across the Front Range also signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which formed
a multi-jurisdictional committee to resolve the concerns and issues of removing
the Basic I/M Program. The website for this committee can be found at -www.ppacg.org/Envir/Air/IM
Transition_cmte.htm

Air Quality
Brochures
PPACG developed a pamphlet entitled
Air Quality in the Pikes Peak Region; Important Facts about Air Quality
Pollutants and Their Associated Health Effects.
This pamphlet describes each of the six air quality pollutants: What they
are; Where they come from; Health effects; and How we are doing.
PPACG developed a pamphlet entitled
Ozone
Pollution in the Pikes Peak Region. This pamphlet describes what
ozone is and how it affects your health and gives strategies
to reduce ozone.
Air Quality Technical Committee
For more information, please contact Rich Muzzy, PPACG Environmental Planning Program Manager at (719)
471-7080, x109, or send email to rmuzzy@ppacg.org.
Items on this page
can be viewed and printed with Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free of charge from Adobe:
